“To say Scripture is the Word of God is to employ a metaphor. God cannot be thought of as literally speaking words, since they are an entirely human phenomenon that could never prove adequate as a medium for the speech of an infinite God.” (Tomlinson)
“Our words aren’t absolutes. Only God is absolute, and God has no intention of sharing this absoluteness with anything, especially words people have come up with to talk about Him. (Rob Bell)
That is the predominant thought on Scripture and the knowability of God among the emergent church. How sad. Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck do an excellent job addressing the danger of holding these views and call the emergent church out on these things by saying that their views , “fly in the face of redemptive history.” (DeYoung, 37). These emergent leaders are questioning whether or not we can have any real, certain knowledge about God. Brian McLaren actually has said that as soon as we say we know something about God that we are speaking heresy because it is impossible to speak about God using our human formulations.
The view that God is unknowable is what has lead to the emergent church’s over-use of the word “mystery.” The authors agree that the Christian faith has elements of mystery…we will NEVER know everything about God. But the emergent church sees that the Christian Faith starts with mystery:
“The Christian faith is mysterious to the core. It is about things and being that ultimately can’t be put into words. Language fails. And if we do definitively put God into words, we have at that very moment made God something God is not…The mystery is the truth.” (Bell, Velvet Elvis)
The authors rightly state that this sounds a lot like the Hindu conception of Brahman that the Christian notion of God, revelation, and authority.
It is interesting to read Acts 17:23, where Paul is addressing the men of Athens: “What therefore you worship as unknown, this I will proclaim to you.” Paul found the Athenians worshipping an unknown God and he CORRECTED them for it and showed them how the Christian God, through Jesus Christ, can be known! In light of the emergent emphasis on living as Jesus lived (which I agree with the importance of that!), you would think that because Jesus viewed the Scriptures as the Word of God, that they would too.
The emergent leaders hold to the view that we need not strive to know anything about God, since we can’t know anything about Him anyways. Rather, we must have a confident trust in God and be focused on a relationship with Him. HELLO??? Does this not seem impossible to anyone? How can you have a relationship with someone that you don’t know? The authors of Why We’re Not Emergent say the following
“ I can’t love my wife without knowing facts about her, otherwise my love for her is love of love, or worse, love for the sake of being loved. Unless I love her for the facts of who she is, what she has done, and what she does, I am loving a shapeless, formless void. No matter how much I rightly stress the importance of relationship with my wife beyond mere knowledge about her, I must have knowledge about her in order to have a relationship. After all, if I don’t know any of the “abstract” and “impersonal” facts about my wife, how can I have a personal relationship with her? I won’t even be able to pick her out in a crowd!” (DeYoung, 36)
This, as DeYoung says, all flies in the face of redemptive history (DeYoung, 37) and every page of Scripture.
“The God of the Bible is nothing if He is not a God who speaks to His people. To be sure , none of us ever infinitely understand God in a nice, neat package of affirmations and denials, but we can know Him truly, both personally and propositionally. God can speak. He can use human language to communicate truth about Himself that is accurate and knowable, without ceasing to be God because we’ve somehow got Him all figured out. We may all be, by nature, like blind men touching the elephant without knowing whether what we are feeling is a trunk, tail, or ear. But what if the elephant spoke and said, “Quit calling me crocodile, or peacock, or paradox. I’m an elephant for crying out loud! That long thing is my trunk. That little frayed thing is my tail. That big floppy thing is my ear.” And what if the elephant gave us ears to hear his voice and a mind to understand his message (cf 1 Cor 2:14-15)? Would our professed ignorance about the elephant and our unwillingness to make any confident assertions about his nature mean we were especially humble, or just deaf?” (DeYoung, 37).